Filed in archive
Entrepreneurship
by Shawn Hessinger on April 23, 2007

CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST
Then, externally funded companies could offer better payments to employees - which in theory attracts better specialists - in reality this also attracts opportunistic employees who don't have any interest in the company itself, but in getting the biggest payout. Leaving to a better paid company is a sure thing for them once an opportunity appears, and even worse the managers can not predict their leave because it's not based on "real things".
CONTINUED NEXT POST
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/65137
Mr Wong
Vote for Employee commitment in bootstrapped versus externally funded companies (Part 3):
|
Rating: 1.31 out of 16 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
James Lowery
(04/24/07 11:20am)
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |
















ring-entreprenuers-hav-pr-0xdz321u58.html.
I talk about big deals like American Idol's reverse merger and smaller ones like Peter Klamka, an investor, who completed a deal with a European solar company with a reverse merger.