Filed in archive
Entrepreneurship
by Shawn Hessinger on April 23, 2007
CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST
Then, externally funded companies could offer better payments to employees - which in theory attracts better specialists - in reality this also attracts opportunistic employees who don't have any interest in the company itself, but in getting the biggest payout. Leaving to a better paid company is a sure thing for them once an opportunity appears, and even worse the managers can not predict their leave because it's not based on "real things".
CONTINUED NEXT POST
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/65137
Addthis
Ask
Blinklist
del.icio.us
Digg
Fark
Facebook
Google
Lycos
Ma.gnolia
Mr Wong
Netscape
Netvousz
Newsvine
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Slashdot
Tailrank
Technorati
Wink
Yahoo
Vote for Employee commitment in bootstrapped versus externally funded companies (Part 3):
|
Rating: 1.31 out of 16 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
James Lowery
(04/24/07 11:20am)
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS |  See all blog subscribe options |
 What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |
ring-entreprenuers-hav-pr-0xdz321u58.html.
I talk about big deals like American Idol's reverse merger and smaller ones like Peter Klamka, an investor, who completed a deal with a European solar company with a reverse merger.